AEG FSE54600Z or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
AEG FSE54600Z
Main drawbackStandard program selection with limited wash variety
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
Across all criteria, Asko DFS344ID.S scores higher (8.6 vs 7.4 out of 10).
- Priority: “Place settings”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.2 / 10 vs 7.4
- Priority: “Noise level”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.5
- Priority: “Eco program water consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.5
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 7.4
- Priority: “Number of programs”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.1 / 10 vs 6.7
By criterion
| Criterion | AEG FSE54600Z | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 7.4 | 8.2 advantage |
| Noise level | 7.5 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8 | 8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 7.5 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program duration | 7.4 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of programs | 6.7 | 9.1 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | AEG FSE54600Z | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,6 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 81,8 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 55 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 13 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 44 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 74 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,9 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 240 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | 5 programs | 9 programs |
| Repairability index | 7 out of 10 | Not provided |
| Installation type | Fully integrated | Freestanding |
| Energy class | C | C |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
AEG FSE54600Z
Leads on 0 criterion of 6 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 5 criteria of 6 compared
- Number of programs: 9.1/10 vs 6.7/10 (9 programs vs 5 programs)
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 7.4/10 (195 min vs 240 min)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.5/10 (42 dB vs 44 dB)
- Eco program water consumption: 8.5/10 vs 7.5/10 (9,2 L/cycle vs 9,9 L/cycle)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, AEG FSE54600Z or Asko DFS344ID.S?
Asko DFS344ID.S scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.4/10 for AEG FSE54600Z, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Number of programs”: 9.1/10 compared with 6.7/10 for AEG FSE54600Z. Recorded values: 9 programs versus 5 programs.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.4/10 for AEG FSE54600Z. Recorded values: 195 min versus 240 min.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.5/10 for AEG FSE54600Z. Recorded values: 42 dB versus 44 dB.
Which wins on “Eco program water consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program water consumption”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.5/10 for AEG FSE54600Z. Recorded values: 9,2 L/cycle versus 9,9 L/cycle.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Place settings”: 8.2/10 compared with 7.4/10 for AEG FSE54600Z. Recorded values: 14 place settings versus 13 place settings.