Asko DFS344ID.S or Grundig GNVP4631DW: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →
Grundig GNVP4631DW
Main drawbackEco electricity consumption among the higher published figures
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Grundig GNVP4631DW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Noise level”Grundig GNVP4631DW 9.4 / 10 vs 8.5
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8 / 10 vs 7.2
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority: “Number of programs”Grundig GNVP4631DW 9.6 / 10 vs 9.1
By criterion
| Criterion | Asko DFS344ID.S | Grundig GNVP4631DW |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 | 9.4 advantage |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 9.4 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8 advantage | 7.2 |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Eco program duration | 9.3 advantage | 7.1 |
| Number of programs | 9.1 | 9.6 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Asko DFS344ID.S | Grundig GNVP4631DW |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 60 cm | 59,8 cm |
| Height | Not provided | 81,8 cm |
| Depth | 59,6 cm | 55 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 16 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 dB | 40 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 74 kWh/100 cycles | 77 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,2 L/cycle | 9,5 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 195 min | 252 min |
| Number of programs | 9 programs | 11 programs |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Fully integrated |
| Energy class | C | C |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery drawer |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Program duration reduction | Half load |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 2 criteria of 6 compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 7.1/10 (195 min vs 252 min)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8/10 vs 7.2/10 (74 kWh/100 cycles vs 77 kWh/100 cycles)
Grundig GNVP4631DW
Leads on 3 criteria of 6 compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 8.2/10 (16 place settings vs 14 place settings)
- Noise level: 9.4/10 vs 8.5/10 (40 dB vs 42 dB)
- Number of programs: 9.6/10 vs 9.1/10 (11 programs vs 9 programs)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Asko DFS344ID.S or Grundig GNVP4631DW?
They're neck and neck: 8.6/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S, 8.5/10 for Grundig GNVP4631DW. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.1/10 for Grundig GNVP4631DW. Recorded values: 195 min versus 252 min.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Grundig GNVP4631DW wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 14 place settings.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Grundig GNVP4631DW wins on “Noise level”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.5/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 40 dB versus 42 dB.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8/10 compared with 7.2/10 for Grundig GNVP4631DW. Recorded values: 74 kWh/100 cycles versus 77 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Grundig GNVP4631DW wins on “Number of programs”: 9.6/10 compared with 9.1/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 11 programs versus 9 programs.