Brandt DFS1010W or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Brandt DFS1010W
Main drawbackLimited capacity for large gatherings and bulky serving dishes
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.2 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Noise level”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 6.9
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8 / 10 vs 7.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Brandt DFS1010W | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 6.8 | 8.2 advantage |
| Noise level | 6.9 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.3 | 8 advantage |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.9 | 8.5 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Brandt DFS1010W | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 44,8 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 84,5 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 60 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 10 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 47 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 76 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | Not provided | 195 min |
| Number of programs | Not provided | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Energy class | E | C |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Program duration reduction |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Brandt DFS1010W
Leads on 0 criterion of 4 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 3 criteria of 4 compared
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 6.9/10 (42 dB vs 47 dB)
- Place settings: 8.2/10 vs 6.8/10 (14 place settings vs 10 place settings)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8/10 vs 7.3/10 (74 kWh/100 cycles vs 76 kWh/100 cycles)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Brandt DFS1010W or Asko DFS344ID.S?
Asko DFS344ID.S scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.4/10 for Brandt DFS1010W, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 6.9/10 for Brandt DFS1010W. Recorded values: 42 dB versus 47 dB.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Place settings”: 8.2/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Brandt DFS1010W. Recorded values: 14 place settings versus 10 place settings.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Brandt DFS1010W. Recorded values: 74 kWh/100 cycles versus 76 kWh/100 cycles.