Head to head

Candy CF 5C6F0W or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?

Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Candy CF 5C6F0W, studio product shot

Candy CF 5C6F0W

7.8/10

Main drawbackAbove-average water consumption in eco mode

Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S, studio product shot

Asko DFS344ID.S

8.6/10

Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback

Read the full analysis →

Our verdict based on your priority

Across all criteria, Asko DFS344ID.S scores higher (8.6 vs 7.8 out of 10).

  • Priority: “Place settings”Candy CF 5C6F0W 9 / 10 vs 8.2
  • Priority: “Noise level”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.1
  • Priority: “Eco program water consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7
  • Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 7.8
  • Priority: “Number of programs”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3

By criterion

Comparison of Candy CF 5C6F0W and Asko DFS344ID.S by criterion
Criterion Candy CF 5C6F0W Asko DFS344ID.S
Place settings 9 advantage 8.2
Noise level 7.1 8.5 advantage
Eco program electricity consumption 7.7 8
Eco program water consumption 7 8.5 advantage
Eco program duration 7.8 9.3 advantage
Number of programs 8.3 9.1 advantage

A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.

Side-by-side specs

Specifications for Candy CF 5C6F0W and Asko DFS344ID.S
SpecificationCandy CF 5C6F0WAsko DFS344ID.S
Width59,7 cm60 cm
Height85 cmNot provided
Depth59,8 cm59,6 cm
Place settings15 place settings14 place settings
Noise level46 dB42 dB
Eco program electricity consumption75 kWh/100 cycles74 kWh/100 cycles
Eco program water consumption10,9 L/cycle9,2 L/cycle
Eco program duration237 min195 min
Number of programs8 programs9 programs
Repairability index8,6 out of 10Not provided
Installation typeFreestandingFreestanding
Energy classCC
End of cycleAutomatic door openingAutomatic door opening
Cutlery storageCutlery basketCutlery basket
Basket layoutHeight-adjustable upper basket, Foldable tinesHeight-adjustable upper basket
Wash optionsHalf loadProgram duration reduction
Drying technologyAutomatic door opening, CondensationAutomatic door opening

Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.

Which is right for you?

Candy CF 5C6F0W

Leads on 1 criterion of 6 compared

  • Place settings: 9/10 vs 8.2/10 (15 place settings vs 14 place settings)
View Candy CF 5C6F0W →

Asko DFS344ID.S

Leads on 4 criteria of 6 compared

  • Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 7.8/10 (195 min vs 237 min)
  • Eco program water consumption: 8.5/10 vs 7/10 (9,2 L/cycle vs 10,9 L/cycle)
  • Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.1/10 (42 dB vs 46 dB)
  • Number of programs: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10 (9 programs vs 8 programs)
View Asko DFS344ID.S →

Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →

Frequently asked questions

Which is rated higher, Candy CF 5C6F0W or Asko DFS344ID.S?

Asko DFS344ID.S scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.8/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W, using the same scoring criteria.

Which wins on “Eco program duration”?

Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.8/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 195 min versus 237 min.

Which wins on “Eco program water consumption”?

Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program water consumption”: 8.5/10 compared with 7/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 9,2 L/cycle versus 10,9 L/cycle.

Which wins on “Noise level”?

Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.1/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 42 dB versus 46 dB.

Which wins on “Place settings”?

Candy CF 5C6F0W wins on “Place settings”: 9/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 15 place settings versus 14 place settings.

Which wins on “Number of programs”?

Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Number of programs”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 9 programs versus 8 programs.

More useful comparisons

Spotted an error on this page? Report it