Candy CF 5C6F0W or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.

Candy CF 5C6F0W
Main drawbackAbove-average water consumption in eco mode
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
Across all criteria, Asko DFS344ID.S scores higher (8.6 vs 7.8 out of 10).
- Priority: “Place settings”Candy CF 5C6F0W 9 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Noise level”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority: “Eco program water consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 7.8
- Priority: “Number of programs”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Candy CF 5C6F0W | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9 advantage | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 7.1 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.7 | 8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 7 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program duration | 7.8 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of programs | 8.3 | 9.1 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Candy CF 5C6F0W | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,7 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 59,8 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 15 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 46 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 75 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 10,9 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 237 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | 8 programs | 9 programs |
| Repairability index | 8,6 out of 10 | Not provided |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Energy class | C | C |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket, Foldable tines | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash options | Half load | Program duration reduction |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening, Condensation | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Candy CF 5C6F0W
Leads on 1 criterion of 6 compared
- Place settings: 9/10 vs 8.2/10 (15 place settings vs 14 place settings)
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 4 criteria of 6 compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 7.8/10 (195 min vs 237 min)
- Eco program water consumption: 8.5/10 vs 7/10 (9,2 L/cycle vs 10,9 L/cycle)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.1/10 (42 dB vs 46 dB)
- Number of programs: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10 (9 programs vs 8 programs)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Candy CF 5C6F0W or Asko DFS344ID.S?
Asko DFS344ID.S scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.8/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.8/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 195 min versus 237 min.
Which wins on “Eco program water consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program water consumption”: 8.5/10 compared with 7/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 9,2 L/cycle versus 10,9 L/cycle.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.1/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 42 dB versus 46 dB.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Candy CF 5C6F0W wins on “Place settings”: 9/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 15 place settings versus 14 place settings.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Number of programs”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Candy CF 5C6F0W. Recorded values: 9 programs versus 8 programs.
