Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620 or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620
Main drawbackAverage eco water consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620 9 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Eco program water consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.2
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 8.8
- Priority: “Number of programs”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620 | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9 advantage | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.2 | 8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 7.2 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program duration | 8.8 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of programs | 8.3 | 9.1 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620 | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,5 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 84,5 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 58,5 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 15 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 72,1 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 10,2 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 215 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | 8 programs | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Energy class | C | C |
| Use | Domestic | Domestic |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Program duration reduction |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620
Leads on 1 criterion of 6 compared
- Place settings: 9/10 vs 8.2/10 (15 place settings vs 14 place settings)
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 3 criteria of 6 compared
- Eco program water consumption: 8.5/10 vs 7.2/10 (9,2 L/cycle vs 10,2 L/cycle)
- Number of programs: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10 (9 programs vs 8 programs)
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 8.8/10 (195 min vs 215 min)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620 or Asko DFS344ID.S?
They're neck and neck: 8.3/10 for Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620, 8.6/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program water consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program water consumption”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.2/10 for Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620. Recorded values: 9,2 L/cycle versus 10,2 L/cycle.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620 wins on “Place settings”: 9/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 15 place settings versus 14 place settings.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Number of programs”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620. Recorded values: 9 programs versus 8 programs.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 8.8/10 for Cecotec Bolero Aguazero 6620. Recorded values: 195 min versus 215 min.