De Dietrich DCJ532DQX or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
De Dietrich DCJ532DQX
Main drawbackHigh eco electricity consumption is our main reservation
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”De Dietrich DCJ532DQX 9 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8 / 10 vs 7.3
- Priority: “Eco program water consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.3
By criterion
| Criterion | De Dietrich DCJ532DQX | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9 advantage | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.3 | 8 advantage |
| Eco program water consumption | 7.3 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program duration | 9.2 | 9.3 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | De Dietrich DCJ532DQX | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 60 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 82 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 55 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 15 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 75,8 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 10 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 198 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | Not provided | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Fully integrated | Freestanding |
| Energy class | C | C |
| Drying technology | Not specified | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
De Dietrich DCJ532DQX
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Place settings: 9/10 vs 8.2/10 (15 place settings vs 14 place settings)
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 2 criteria of 5 compared
- Eco program water consumption: 8.5/10 vs 7.3/10 (9,2 L/cycle vs 10 L/cycle)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8/10 vs 7.3/10 (74 kWh/100 cycles vs 75,8 kWh/100 cycles)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, De Dietrich DCJ532DQX or Asko DFS344ID.S?
They're neck and neck: 8.3/10 for De Dietrich DCJ532DQX, 8.6/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program water consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program water consumption”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.3/10 for De Dietrich DCJ532DQX. Recorded values: 9,2 L/cycle versus 10 L/cycle.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
De Dietrich DCJ532DQX wins on “Place settings”: 9/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 15 place settings versus 14 place settings.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8/10 compared with 7.3/10 for De Dietrich DCJ532DQX. Recorded values: 74 kWh/100 cycles versus 75,8 kWh/100 cycles.