Electrolux ESA47210SX or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Electrolux ESA47210SX
Main drawbackEco electricity consumption is among the highest stated figures
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
Across all criteria, Asko DFS344ID.S scores higher (8.6 vs 7.4 out of 10).
- Priority: “Place settings”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.2 / 10 vs 7.4
- Priority: “Noise level”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.5
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8 / 10 vs 6.5
- Priority: “Eco program water consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.5
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 7.4
- Priority: “Number of programs”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Electrolux ESA47210SX | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 7.4 | 8.2 advantage |
| Noise level | 7.5 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 6.5 | 8 advantage |
| Eco program water consumption | 7.5 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program duration | 7.4 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of programs | 8.3 | 9.1 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Electrolux ESA47210SX | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,8 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 62,2 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 13 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 44 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 94 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,9 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 240 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | 8 programs | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Energy class | E | C |
| Use | Domestic | Domestic |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Extra hygiene | Program duration reduction |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Electrolux ESA47210SX
Leads on 0 criterion of 6 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 6 criteria of 6 compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 7.4/10 (195 min vs 240 min)
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8/10 vs 6.5/10 (74 kWh/100 cycles vs 94 kWh/100 cycles)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.5/10 (42 dB vs 44 dB)
- Eco program water consumption: 8.5/10 vs 7.5/10 (9,2 L/cycle vs 9,9 L/cycle)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Electrolux ESA47210SX or Asko DFS344ID.S?
Asko DFS344ID.S scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.4/10 for Electrolux ESA47210SX, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.4/10 for Electrolux ESA47210SX. Recorded values: 195 min versus 240 min.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8/10 compared with 6.5/10 for Electrolux ESA47210SX. Recorded values: 74 kWh/100 cycles versus 94 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Electrolux ESA47210SX. Recorded values: 42 dB versus 44 dB.
Which wins on “Eco program water consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program water consumption”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Electrolux ESA47210SX. Recorded values: 9,2 L/cycle versus 9,9 L/cycle.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Place settings”: 8.2/10 compared with 7.4/10 for Electrolux ESA47210SX. Recorded values: 14 place settings versus 13 place settings.