Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0 or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0
Main drawbackThe very long eco cycle is the main practical constraint
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Place settings”Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0 9.4 / 10 vs 8.2
- Priority: “Eco program water consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.5
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 7.4
By criterion
| Criterion | Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0 | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 9.4 advantage | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.4 | 8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 7.5 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program duration | 7.4 | 9.3 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0 | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | Not provided | 60 cm |
| Depth | Not provided | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 16 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 66 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,9 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 240 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | Not provided | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Not specified | Freestanding |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Place settings: 9.4/10 vs 8.2/10 (16 place settings vs 14 place settings)
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 2 criteria of 5 compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 7.4/10 (195 min vs 240 min)
- Eco program water consumption: 8.5/10 vs 7.5/10 (9,2 L/cycle vs 9,9 L/cycle)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0 or Asko DFS344ID.S?
They're neck and neck: 8.2/10 for Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0, 8.6/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 7.4/10 for Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0. Recorded values: 195 min versus 240 min.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0 wins on “Place settings”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.2/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 16 place settings versus 14 place settings.
Which wins on “Eco program water consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program water consumption”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Hotpoint HA6IB16B2M6L0. Recorded values: 9,2 L/cycle versus 9,9 L/cycle.