Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA
Main drawbackVery long eco cycle when you are waiting for dishes
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Noise level”Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA 9.4 / 10 vs 8.5
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA 9 / 10 vs 8
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 6.9
By criterion
| Criterion | Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 9.4 advantage | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 9 advantage | 8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Eco program duration | 6.9 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of programs | 9.1 | 9.1 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,8 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 84,5 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 60 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 40 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 54,3 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,5 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 280 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | 9 programs | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Energy class | A | C |
| Use | Domestic | Domestic |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Extra drying | Program duration reduction |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA
Leads on 2 criteria of 6 compared
- Eco program electricity consumption: 9/10 vs 8/10 (54,3 kWh/100 cycles vs 74 kWh/100 cycles)
- Noise level: 9.4/10 vs 8.5/10 (40 dB vs 42 dB)
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 1 criterion of 6 compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 6.9/10 (195 min vs 280 min)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA or Asko DFS344ID.S?
They're neck and neck: 8.5/10 for Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA, 8.6/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 6.9/10 for Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA. Recorded values: 195 min versus 280 min.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 9/10 compared with 8/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 54,3 kWh/100 cycles versus 74 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Midea MDWEF1433DSS-WA wins on “Noise level”: 9.4/10 compared with 8.5/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 40 dB versus 42 dB.