Neff S175HCX03E or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Neff S175HCX03E
Main drawbackVery long eco cycle requires planning between meals
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
Across all criteria, Asko DFS344ID.S scores higher (8.6 vs 7.9 out of 10).
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Number of programs”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.1 / 10 vs 7.2
By criterion
| Criterion | Neff S175HCX03E | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.7 | 8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Eco program duration | 6.7 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of programs | 7.2 | 9.1 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Neff S175HCX03E | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,8 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 81,5 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 55 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 75 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 295 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | 6 programs | 9 programs |
| Repairability index | 9,2 out of 10 | Not provided |
| Installation type | Fully integrated | Freestanding |
| Energy class | C | C |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Program duration reduction | Program duration reduction |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Neff S175HCX03E
Leads on 0 criterion of 6 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 2 criteria of 6 compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 6.7/10 (195 min vs 295 min)
- Number of programs: 9.1/10 vs 7.2/10 (9 programs vs 6 programs)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Neff S175HCX03E or Asko DFS344ID.S?
Asko DFS344ID.S scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.9/10 for Neff S175HCX03E, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Neff S175HCX03E. Recorded values: 195 min versus 295 min.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Number of programs”: 9.1/10 compared with 7.2/10 for Neff S175HCX03E. Recorded values: 9 programs versus 6 programs.