Samsung DW60DG790I00 or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Samsung DW60DG790I00
Main drawbackVery long Eco cycle complicates cleanup between closely spaced meals
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Noise level”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.8
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Samsung DW60DG790I00 9.2 / 10 vs 8
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 6.8
By criterion
| Criterion | Samsung DW60DG790I00 | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 7.8 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 9.2 advantage | 8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Eco program duration | 6.8 | 9.3 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Samsung DW60DG790I00 | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 59,5 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 81,5 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 55,2 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 43 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 54 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,4 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 290 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | Not provided | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Fully integrated | Freestanding |
| Energy class | A | C |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery drawer | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Program duration reduction |
| Drying technology | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Samsung DW60DG790I00
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Eco program electricity consumption: 9.2/10 vs 8/10 (54 kWh/100 cycles vs 74 kWh/100 cycles)
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 2 criteria of 5 compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 6.8/10 (195 min vs 290 min)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.8/10 (42 dB vs 43 dB)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Samsung DW60DG790I00 or Asko DFS344ID.S?
They're neck and neck: 8.2/10 for Samsung DW60DG790I00, 8.6/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Samsung DW60DG790I00. Recorded values: 195 min versus 290 min.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Samsung DW60DG790I00 wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 9.2/10 compared with 8/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 54 kWh/100 cycles versus 74 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.8/10 for Samsung DW60DG790I00. Recorded values: 42 dB versus 43 dB.