Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C
Main drawbackEco electricity consumption among the highest published figures
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Eco program water consumption”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.7
By criterion
| Criterion | Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Noise level | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 7.7 | 8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 7.7 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program duration | 9.2 | 9.3 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 60 cm | 60 cm |
| Height | 85 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | 61 cm | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 14 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 42 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 75 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,8 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 198 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | Not provided | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Freestanding | Freestanding |
| Energy class | C | C |
| Use | Domestic | Domestic |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Drying technology | Not specified | Automatic door opening |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C
Leads on 0 criterion of 5 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 1 criterion of 5 compared
- Eco program water consumption: 8.5/10 vs 7.7/10 (9,2 L/cycle vs 9,8 L/cycle)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C or Asko DFS344ID.S?
Asko DFS344ID.S scores 8.6/10, compared with 8/10 for Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Eco program water consumption”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program water consumption”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.7/10 for Valberg 14S42 C XAD929C. Recorded values: 9,2 L/cycle versus 9,8 L/cycle.