Gaggenau DF480101 or Asko DFI544DXXL: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Gaggenau DF480101
Main drawbackVery long eco cycle poorly suited to getting dishes back quickly
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFI544DXXL
Main drawbackLong eco cycle needs room in your schedule
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
Across all criteria, Asko DFI544DXXL scores higher (8.7 vs 7.8 out of 10).
- Priority: “Place settings”Asko DFI544DXXL 8.2 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority: “Noise level”Asko DFI544DXXL 8.5 / 10 vs 7.8
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFI544DXXL 9.3 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Number of programs”Asko DFI544DXXL 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Gaggenau DF480101 | Asko DFI544DXXL |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 7.1 | 8.2 advantage |
| Noise level | 7.8 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Eco program duration | 6.7 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of programs | 8.3 | 9.1 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Gaggenau DF480101 | Asko DFI544DXXL |
|---|---|---|
| Width | Not provided | 59,6 cm |
| Height | 81,5 cm | 85,9 cm |
| Depth | Not provided | 55,4 cm |
| Place settings | 12 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 43 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 62,6 kWh/100 cycles | 64 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,5 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 295 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | 8 programs | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Fully integrated | Fully integrated |
| Energy class | B | B |
| Use | Domestic | Domestic |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Foldable tines |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Intensive wash zone |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Gaggenau DF480101
Leads on 0 criterion of 6 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Asko DFI544DXXL
Leads on 4 criteria of 6 compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 6.7/10 (195 min vs 295 min)
- Place settings: 8.2/10 vs 7.1/10 (14 place settings vs 12 place settings)
- Number of programs: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10 (9 programs vs 8 programs)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.8/10 (42 dB vs 43 dB)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Gaggenau DF480101 or Asko DFI544DXXL?
Asko DFI544DXXL scores 8.7/10, compared with 7.8/10 for Gaggenau DF480101, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 195 min versus 295 min.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Place settings”: 8.2/10 compared with 7.1/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 14 place settings versus 12 place settings.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Number of programs”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 9 programs versus 8 programs.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Asko DFI544DXXL wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.8/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 42 dB versus 43 dB.