Gaggenau DF480101 or Asko DFS344ID.S: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two dishwashers using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Gaggenau DF480101
Main drawbackVery long eco cycle poorly suited to getting dishes back quickly
Read the full analysis →
Asko DFS344ID.S
Main drawbackAverage Eco electricity consumption is the main drawback
Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
Across all criteria, Asko DFS344ID.S scores higher (8.6 vs 7.8 out of 10).
- Priority: “Place settings”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.2 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority: “Noise level”Asko DFS344ID.S 8.5 / 10 vs 7.8
- Priority: “Eco program electricity consumption”Gaggenau DF480101 8.8 / 10 vs 8
- Priority: “Eco program duration”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.3 / 10 vs 6.7
- Priority: “Number of programs”Asko DFS344ID.S 9.1 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Gaggenau DF480101 | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Place settings | 7.1 | 8.2 advantage |
| Noise level | 7.8 | 8.5 advantage |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 8.8 advantage | 8 |
| Eco program water consumption | 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Eco program duration | 6.7 | 9.3 advantage |
| Number of programs | 8.3 | 9.1 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Gaggenau DF480101 | Asko DFS344ID.S |
|---|---|---|
| Width | Not provided | 60 cm |
| Height | 81,5 cm | Not provided |
| Depth | Not provided | 59,6 cm |
| Place settings | 12 place settings | 14 place settings |
| Noise level | 43 dB | 42 dB |
| Eco program electricity consumption | 62,6 kWh/100 cycles | 74 kWh/100 cycles |
| Eco program water consumption | 9,5 L/cycle | 9,2 L/cycle |
| Eco program duration | 295 min | 195 min |
| Number of programs | 8 programs | 9 programs |
| Installation type | Fully integrated | Freestanding |
| Energy class | B | C |
| Use | Domestic | Domestic |
| End of cycle | Automatic door opening | Automatic door opening |
| Cutlery storage | Cutlery basket | Cutlery basket |
| Basket layout | Height-adjustable upper basket | Height-adjustable upper basket |
| Wash programs | Eco | Eco |
| Wash options | Half load | Program duration reduction |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Gaggenau DF480101
Leads on 1 criterion of 6 compared
- Eco program electricity consumption: 8.8/10 vs 8/10 (62,6 kWh/100 cycles vs 74 kWh/100 cycles)
Asko DFS344ID.S
Leads on 4 criteria of 6 compared
- Eco program duration: 9.3/10 vs 6.7/10 (195 min vs 295 min)
- Place settings: 8.2/10 vs 7.1/10 (14 place settings vs 12 place settings)
- Number of programs: 9.1/10 vs 8.3/10 (9 programs vs 8 programs)
- Noise level: 8.5/10 vs 7.8/10 (42 dB vs 43 dB)
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Gaggenau DF480101 or Asko DFS344ID.S?
Asko DFS344ID.S scores 8.6/10, compared with 7.8/10 for Gaggenau DF480101, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Eco program duration”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Eco program duration”: 9.3/10 compared with 6.7/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 195 min versus 295 min.
Which wins on “Place settings”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Place settings”: 8.2/10 compared with 7.1/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 14 place settings versus 12 place settings.
Which wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”?
Gaggenau DF480101 wins on “Eco program electricity consumption”: 8.8/10 compared with 8/10 for Asko DFS344ID.S. Recorded values: 62,6 kWh/100 cycles versus 74 kWh/100 cycles.
Which wins on “Number of programs”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Number of programs”: 9.1/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 9 programs versus 8 programs.
Which wins on “Noise level”?
Asko DFS344ID.S wins on “Noise level”: 8.5/10 compared with 7.8/10 for Gaggenau DF480101. Recorded values: 42 dB versus 43 dB.